Whether interventions have sustainable impacts after they end is a question of considerable policy and programmatic importance. The nascent literature on this topic shows mixed findings, and focuses on sustained (or not) impacts on consumption, assets, and poverty. We advance knowledge by assessing whether an intervention designed to convey knowledge about agricultural and nutrition through an approach that explicitly aimed to break down traditional gendered “siloes of activities” had sustained impacts on aspects of women’s empowerment. Further, we assess whether the form of the training (agriculture, nutrition, gender sensitization) affected the likelihood or magnitude of the persistence of impacts. Our core finding is that ANGeL had sustained impacts four years after it ended, increasing the likelihood that women were empowered by four percentage points and reducing intra-household inequality by three percentage points. The magnitudes of these impacts are comparable across treatment arms.